The Hematologist

November-December 2019, Volume 16, Issue 6

Voxelotor: Changing the Disease by Changing the Conformation

Samuel Wilson, MD Fellow, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology Division
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
Ifeyinwa (Ify) Osunkwo, MD, MPH Director, Sickle Cell Disease Enterprise
Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Chapel Hill, NC
Kathleen Monahan, DO Internal Medicine Resident
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Jane Little, MD Director, Sickle Cell Program; Professor of Medicine
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

Published on: October 23, 2019

Vichinsky E, Hoppe CC, Ataga KI, et al. A phase 3 randomized trial of voxelotor in sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:509-519.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a global problem, estimated to affect more than 100,000 individuals in the United States and millions of people worldwide.1 SCD results from a single nucleotide substitution in the β-globin chain of adult hemoglobin (HbA), which produces instead sickle hemoglobin (HbS). When tense (deoxygenated Hb, or “T-state” Hb), HbS polymerizes, leading to damage and distortion of the red blood cell (RBC), hemolysis, inflammation, thrombosis, acute vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), and chronic cumulative vasculopathy.2,3 Despite the global burden, high-grade morbidity, and early mortality, disease-modifying medications for SCD have been few, with hydroxyurea being the sole U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medication for SCD for 20 years, until the recent approval of L-glutamine.3

The placebo-controlled randomized phase III HOPE trial, conducted by Dr. Elliott Vichinsky and colleagues, and sponsored by Global Blood Therapeutics, is a refreshing example of the current renewed interest in novel therapeutics in SCD. Voxelotor (GBT440) is an orally bioavailable small molecule that causes a delay in HbS polymerization (central to pathophysiology in SCD) by reversibly binding to α-globin in 30 to 40 percent of Hb molecules/RBC, causing an allosteric conformational change and an increase in oxygen affinity (more oxygenated or “S-state” Hb). This is likely disease modifying, analogous to increased Hb F in patients on hydroxyurea or with an hereditary persistence of fetal Hb.4 Drs. William Eaton and H. Franklin Bunn convincingly argued that even small reductions in polymerization of HbS are key in ameliorating the clinical outcomes of SCD.5 In murine models of SCD, voxelotor had been shown to increase the half-life of erythrocytes, reduce sickling, and improve anemia.6 In a phase I/II clinical trial, voxelotor was overall well tolerated at a dose of 1,000 mg daily, with reduction in anemia and hemolysis.7

The HOPE trial was an international effort, with a primary endpoint defined as the percentage of patients with an increase in total Hb of 1 gm/dL at 24 weeks, although treatment extended up to 72 weeks. Secondary endpoints included mean change in Hb, annualized incidence rate of VOC, and laboratory markers of hemolysis. Individuals eligible for the study were between the ages of 12 to 65 years. All major SCD subtypes were eligible, but more than 85 percent of patients studied had HbS or HbSβ0. Crucially, individuals on hydroxyurea were not excluded. The authors enrolled 274 participants with well-distributed baseline characteristics. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 fashion to treatment groups receiving either voxelotor 1,500 mg, voxelotor 900 mg, or placebo.

Key findings in this trial were significant improvement in anemia and a possible improvement in hemolysis, without undue near-term toxicity. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was a significantly higher percentage of patients with a mean Hb response in the voxelotor 1,500 mg group (51%; 95% CI, 41-61) than in the placebo group (7%; 95% CI, 1-12; p <0.001). The 900 mg dose had an intermediate effect. Secondary endpoints showed a possible decrease in hemolysis (% indirect bilirubin and % reticulocytes decreased significantly with treatment, but no significant reduction in lactate dehydrogenase and absolute reticulocyte count). There was no difference between groups regarding percentage receiving RBC transfusion, and there was a nonsignificant reduction in annualized VOC in voxelotor-treated patients versus the placebo group. Safety data were encouraging as most adverse events reported were grade 1 or 2, with diarrhea and headache being the most common. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher did not differ between groups.

Despite the significant optimism engendered by the HOPE trial, caveats remain that should be fully explored before voxelotor is universally adopted. Safety risks not fully evaluated in the HOPE trial include delayed oxygen delivery to the cerebral cortex in patients at risk for silent cerebral infarction. As Drs. Robert Hebbel and Bo Hedlund point out, physiology is not linear, and an increase in Hb may not translate to an increase in tissue oxygen delivery, especially with agents that affect oxygen affinity.8 Erythropoietin levels did not differ between treated and untreated patients in the HOPE trial, suggesting that the renal cortex did not detect a physiological decrease in oxygen delivery in vivo. However, the impact of voxelotor on the cerebral cortex, which is highly dependent on oxygen delivery, cannot be readily assessed via biochemical surrogates and needs to be followed closely in the coming years, optimally with more sensitive neuroimaging.9 Additionally, patients with SCD who were not well-represented in the HOPE trial include those with HbSC and HbSβ+, as well as HbS patients with total Hb less than 7 g/dL. Caution should be used before extending voxelotor to these subpopulations without further study. In variant SCD especially, more data are needed about blood viscosity,10 which has been associated with increased risk for VOC and osteonecrosis and is expected to rise in conjunction with hematocrit (Hct).2 Previous viscosity measurements for voxelotor, normalized to a Hct of 30 percent in vitro, showed improvement in viscosity,10 but this may not reflect in vivo changes at true Hct values. Finally, the effect of voxelotor on additional clinically meaningful endpoints such as quality of life and frequency of VOC will need to be established.

The HOPE trial showed that voxelotor had great potential for mitigating hemoglobin levels of individuals with SCD and its downstream effects. However, as with any new agent, it is only with careful study and vigilant observation in the first years of its use that we will truly understand the best and safest ways to use voxelotor.

References

  1. Piel FB, Steinberg MH, Rees DC. Sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1561-1573.
  2. Kato GJ, Piel FB, Reid CD, et al. Sickle cell disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18010.
  3. Carden MA, Little J. Emerging disease-modifying therapies for sickle cell disease. Haematologica. 2019;104:1710-1719.
  4. Metcalf B, Chuang C, Dufu K, et al. Discovery of GBT440, an orally bioavailable R-state stabilizer of sickle cell hemoglobin. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2017;8:321-326.
  5. Eaton WA, Bunn HF. Treating sickle cell disease by targeting HbS polymerization. Blood. 2017;129:2719-2726.
  6. Oksenberg D, Dufu K, Patel MP, et al. GBT440 increases haemoglobin oxygen affinity, reduces sickling and prolongs RBC half-life in a murine model of sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol. 2016;175:141-153.
  7. Howard J, Hemmaway CJ,Telfer P, et al. A phase 1/2 ascending dose study and open-label extension study of voxelotor in patients with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2019;133:1865-1875.
  8. Hebbel RP, Hedlund BE. Sickle hemoglobin oxygen affinity-shifting strategies have unequal cerebrovascular risks. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:321-325.
  9. Jordan LC, DeBaun MR. Cerebral hemodynamic assessment and neuroimaging across the lifespan in sickle cell disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018;38:1438-1448.
  10. Dufu K, Patel M. Oksenberg D, et al. GBT440 improves red blood cell deformability and reduces viscosity of sickle cell blood under deoxygenated conditions. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;70:95-105.

Conflict of Interests

Dr. Wilson, Dr. Monahan, Dr. Little, and Dr. Osunkwo indicated no relevant conflicts of interest. back to top